Monday, November 14, 2005

The perennial question

Quality VS. Quantity.

A very skewed 'voting' at www.ridewithpride.blogspot.com, is questioning the masses on who's muscles are bigger. BUT, he has forgotten to question the masses, who's muscle quality (muscularity, lower fat %, definition, etc) is better?

I think 'better' is a more highly sort after good than 'bigger'. What is size without quality?

give it some time and ponder.

AND also, vote in my tagboard, who's 'quality' is of higher grade.

take that, Mr Ang Kong Kia!

No comments: